Top 8 TON Wallets to Store Your TON and Jettons

Choosing a TON Wallet

Choosing a TON wallet feels simple on the surface. Download an app. Create a wallet. Store coins.
That illusion breaks the moment real value enters the picture.

TON works differently from many blockchains. Speed stays high. Fees stay low. Telegram integration changes how users interact with crypto entirely. Wallet choice becomes a strategy, not a setup.

Some wallets focus on pure self-custody. Some prioritize Telegram-native flow. Others stretch across multiple blockchains. A few combine convenience with long-term security.

Before picking anything, one question matters more than all others:

How do you actually plan to use TON?

Daily transfers. Jettons (fungible tokens). NFTs. dApps. Long-term holding. Telegram-based payments. Each use case pushes you toward a different wallet profile.

What Are TON Wallets?

TON wallets store private keys that authorize actions on The Open Network.

They do not store coins. They prove ownership.

Every TON transfer, Jetton movement, staking action, or dApp interaction requires cryptographic approval. The wallet builds that approval, signs it, and sends it to the network.

At a practical level, a TON wallet performs four functions:

• Displays balances
• Creates transactions
• Signs messages
• Connects to TON applications

If Telegram is central to usage, TON space expands this role by embedding wallet functionality into Telegram itself, reducing friction without removing self-custody.

How to Choose a Wallet for Your TON Assets?

Wallet selection stops being confusing when filtered through real behavior instead of feature lists.

Key decision points:

• Custody: Self-custodial control versus service-managed access
• Jetton support: Essential for most TON activity
• Telegram integration: Critical for messaging-first users
• dApp access: Clean approvals, readable transaction prompts
• Security posture: Passcodes, biometrics, seed backup clarity
• Device scope: Mobile-only, web, or hardware compatibility

One common pattern works well:

• A hot wallet for daily activity
• A cold wallet for long-term holding

The TON ecosystem cleanly supports this split.

1. Tonkeeper – Native Wallet for the TON Network

Tonkeeper often becomes the first wallet users encounter when entering the TON ecosystem.

The reason stays simple.
It feels native.

The interface focuses entirely on TON. Transfers stay fast. Jettons display cleanly. NFTs show correctly. dApp approvals remain readable.

Tonkeeper fits users who:

• Interact with TON apps regularly
• Manage Jettons actively
• Prefer a clean, purpose-built environment

It works well as a daily-use TON wallet, especially when activity stays within the TON ecosystem.

Read More: What are crypto wallets, & how do they work?

2. MyTonWallet – Native Open Source Wallet for TON Network

MyTonWallet takes a different approach.

Transparency leads.
Open-source development attracts users who want visibility into how the wallet operates.

The wallet keeps a strong TON-native focus while appealing to technically aware users who care about long-term reliability and verifiability.

Why users choose it:

• Clear TON support without distractions
• Open-source development philosophy
• Compatibility with advanced security setups

Many users pair MyTonWallet with hardware wallets for long-term storage, creating a balance between usability and protection.

3. Wallet.tg – Telegram-Integrated Wallet for the TON Network

Wallet.tg shifts the entire experience.

Instead of pulling users into a separate app, it brings the wallet into Telegram itself.

This is where TON space becomes relevant.

It represents a self-custodial wallet environment built around Telegram’s interface, allowing users to manage TON assets, Jettons, NFTs, and dApps without leaving the messaging platform.

Why this matters:

• Telegram-native flow lowers onboarding friction
• Payments feel conversational instead of transactional
• TON usage blends into everyday communication

For users who live inside Telegram, Wallet.tg with TON space transforms TON from “crypto activity” into routine digital interaction.

4. Tonhub – Mobile Wallet for the TON Network

Tonhub focuses on mobile simplicity.

The wallet keeps self-custody intact while offering features like swaps and staking access depending on configuration.

Tonhub works well for users who:

• Prefer mobile-only management
• Want clean, minimal setup
• Hold and transact TON without heavy dApp exposure

It fills the role of a practical TON wallet without forcing advanced complexity.

5. Gem Wallet – Multichain Wallet With Support for TON Network

Gem Wallet comes into play when portfolios expand beyond TON.

Some users hold assets across multiple blockchains and want fewer apps to manage everything.

Gem Wallet supports TON while maintaining the multichain architecture.

It suits users who:

• Hold multiple assets across ecosystems
• Want unified access without constant app switching
• Still need Jetton visibility and transfers

It trades some TON-specific polish for broader coverage.

Read More: How to Set Up a Crypto Wallet India: A Simple Guide

6. Trust Wallet – Multichain Wallet That Supports TON

Trust Wallet appears in many wallets lists for one reason.

Scale.

Millions already use it. Adding TON becomes a natural extension rather than a new habit.

Trust Wallet works best for:

• Users already managing assets there
• Simple holding across many chains
• Convenience-driven setups

For deeper TON engagement, some users pair Trust Wallet with a TON-native wallet to avoid feature limitations.

7. Ledger – Popular Hardware Wallet Supporting Over 50 Networks

Ledger changes the security equation.

Instead of keeping private keys on a phone, Ledger stores them offline inside a hardware device.

For TON users, Ledger usually works alongside compatible TON interfaces rather than standalone apps.

Why Ledger matters:

• Keys never touch internet-connected devices
• Malware risks drop sharply
• Long-term storage feels safer

A common setup:

• Daily TON wallet on mobile
• Long-term holdings secured via Ledger

This structure balances usability with protection.

8. SafePal Wallet – Multichain Wallet That Supports Toncoin and Jettons

SafePal sits between convenience and security.

It offers a multichain wallet experience while also supporting hardware-style protection options within its ecosystem.

SafePal appeals to users who:

• Want multichain flexibility
• Prefer a single brand for app and hardware paths
• Hold TON alongside other assets

It works well for users who want growth flexibility without committing fully to a hardware-only workflow.

Comparing Top TON Wallets

A clear comparison removes guesswork and replaces it with intent. TON wallets differ less by branding and more by how they fit into daily behavior. Each option below serves a specific usage pattern, and understanding that context matters far more than chasing features.

Tonkeeper works best for users who stay active inside the TON ecosystem. Transfers feel instant. Jettons display cleanly. dApp approvals stay readable. It suits frequent senders, DeFi users, and anyone who treats TON as a daily network rather than a passive holding. The experience feels native because it is built only for TON, without compromises for other chains.

MyTonWallet attracts users who value transparency and control. Open-source development builds confidence for long-term usage. It fits power users who want clarity around wallet behavior and compatibility with advanced security setups. Many users treat it as a core wallet paired with additional security layers.

Wallet.tg stands apart. It reshapes behavior entirely. By living inside Telegram and integrating TON space, it turns wallets into communication tools. Sending TON feels like sending a message. This option fits users who operate primarily through Telegram and want payments, Jettons, and NFTs to blend into daily conversations without friction.

Tonhub keeps things minimal. It focuses on mobile-first usage with straightforward self-custody. It fits users who want clean execution without managing advanced features. Holding, sending, and basic interaction feel simple and controlled.

Gem Wallet suits multichain users. It reduces app clutter by supporting multiple networks while still handling TON assets properly. It works well for diversified portfolios, even if it trades some TON-specific polish for breadth.

Trust Wallet benefits from familiarity. Many users already trust it for other assets. Adding TON becomes an extension rather than a switch. It fits holding-focused users who value convenience and brand recognition.

Ledger changes the security profile entirely. It removes private keys from internet-connected devices. It suits long-term holders who prioritize protection over speed. Most users pair Ledger with a software interface for balance visibility while keeping signing offline.

SafePal sits between convenience and security. It supports TON alongside other networks and offers optional hardware-style protection. 

No single wallet wins universally.

The best choice follows how you use TON, not how loudly a wallet markets itself.

Conclusion

TON continues to blur the line between messaging, payments, and decentralized finance.

Wallet choice shapes how that experience unfolds.

Telegram-heavy users often gravitate toward TON space because it removes friction entirely.

Active TON users prefer native wallets like Tonkeeper or MyTonWallet.

Long-term holders lean toward Ledger-backed setups for peace of mind.

A simple rule holds:

• Use hot wallets for activity
• Use cold wallets for value

The TON ecosystem supports both without forcing compromise.

FAQs